Loading...
Essentialism is a cognitive bias where individuals believe that certain categories, such as people, animals, or objects, have an inherent essence that gives them their identity. This bias often leads to overgeneralization and stereotyping, as individuals attribute fixed traits to members of these categories.
Essentialism operates by instinctively categorizing information based on perceived intrinsic qualities or essence. It simplifies complex information and fills informational gaps by projecting assumed characteristics onto an entire group, therefore painting broad generalizations instead of nuanced understandings.
Essentialism can lead to stereotyping, prejudice, discrimination, and a lack of understanding of the individual diversities within a group. This bias can undermine social cohesion and fuel conflicts by perpetuating unjust assumptions and limiting opportunities based on rigid group identities.
To counteract essentialism, actively seek diverse perspectives and information. Encourage critical thinking and questions that challenge stereotypes. Promote and engage in education that emphasizes individual variability over generalized group traits.
Critics of essentialism argue that it oversimplifies the complex nature of identity and knowledge. The reductionist approach of attributing a single 'essence' to categories fails to account for the dynamic and multifaceted nature of individuals and groups, leading to harmful oversimplifications.
‘The Essential Child: Origins of Essentialism in Everyday Thought’
Gelman, S. A. (2003)
Oxford Series in Cognitive Development
Reconceptualizing the Development of Social Categories: A Domain-Based Approach
Rhodes, M., Gelman, S. A., and Karuza, J. C. (2014)
Cognitive Science
Psychological essentialism
Medin, D. L., & Ortony, A. (1989)
S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), 'Similarity and analogical reasoning'